It is no secret that I’m very interested in how teams work, how individuals (ME) fit into a team, and how we all come together to get the job done.

A colleague of mine posted an interesting job description for a Director of Law Firm Marketing and Public Relations:

  • “Intense Measurement” is your mantra. You prescribe to the theory that water boils at 212⁰F. Not at 210⁰ or 211⁰. It has to be 212⁰F. Even if you have 99.5% of the heat you need – your water is at 210⁰F – it won’t boil. Yet if you just tweak one or two small things – move the pot slightly to the right or increase the fuel a hair – suddenly everything changes. The water starts to boil. The same applies to the Marketing and Public Relations Director’s job – you can put lots of effort into it, but nothing “boils” until you look for those missing, magical “degrees” that could change everything. Whether you need to place more “streaming ads” on sports radio stations on Mondays, you need a direct response campaign during the heaviest tax return weeks, or you’re convinced we need a same-sex only divorce site (one in five couples meet online, but three-in-five gay couples meet online)…you never give up and the “perpetual beta” is something that you focus on day-in and day-out;
  • You’re a quick study with strong people skills…you have the ability to read people quickly (and accurately)…you are approachable, inspire candor and welcome multiple points of view;
  • Basic marketing research skills: you know how to collect information, analyze research and develop reports explaining their findings. You use calculations and formulas to evaluate data as you attempt to forecast future trends, and use information you find to support these claims;
  • You have a love and knack for writing, you “rock” in social media marketing, and you can write original copy based on your solid understanding of our primary areas;
  • You are proficient in Microsoft Office and Acrobat, and you know the basics of Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign, and
  • You can juggle multiple priorities simultaneously, establish clear priorities, meet deadlines and remain laser focused on the goal in a never-ending environment of change.

I love it.

I would hope that the resumes coming in will be include a wider pool of folks who will be the right fit, but perhaps not have the spot-on skill set that you would get from a functionally focused job description.

Some of these skills can easily be learned, especially if you have an inquisitive personality, and enjoy learning new things. But you cannot teach someone to be inquisitive or have a desire to learn.

Reminds me of some interview questions I’ve been asked over the years: “How can you market us in New York when you live in Los Angeles?” “Can you tell us about your experience marketing lawyers within the ABC industry?” “Who are your PR contacts in XYZ community/industry?”

Really? Why not ask me what I’m going to do in my first 90 days?

I don’t need to live in Santa Barbara, or Silicon Valley, or Denver to understand how to build up and learn about those markets, manage resources, and identify opportunities. Yet I have successfully taken on responsibilities in all of those markets, and work with lawyers to expand their practices in each community.

I knew very little about the insurance industry when I took on my current job. Probably why I subscribed to every insurance industry/business publication I could find during that first week.

We recently held a very successful industry conference for one of our practice groups. I didn’t sit in the sessions as my head was focused on all the logistics and I wouldn’t have heard a thing.

One of the lawyerly types said I would probably be bored learning about the minutia of what they do.

Actually, I do need to know what the lawyers do, and how the clients operate, but on a just below the surface level.

As I told one of my partners: I need to know enough about what you do to identify opportunities and help you market your practice.

But the real answer goes a bit deeper then that:

  • I need to understand the marketplace where the attorney operates. I need a clear understanding of who their buyer and influencers are.
  • I need to know the legal resources used, and where to find the answers to questions I might have.
  • I need to know the legal terms, and the major laws and legislation surrounding the industry. Where are the hurdles and brick walls that clients come up against?
  • I need to understand the business lines of the clients involved, and how they are currently operating in the marketplace. I need to have a clear understanding of the business needs and concerns of the client.
  • I don’t need to know enough to do the lawyer’s job.
  • I don’t need to run the client’s business.
  • I need to be able to connect the dots between the client’s business problems and our attorneys’ legal solutions.
  • And I really need to understand how my firm and our attorneys differentiate from our competitors.

So lacking specific industry, marketplace or functional experience should not be a game-stopper for interviewing or hiring an individual for a specific job. For those involved in the hiring process I would want to know:

  • How does she fit in the existing teams within the firm, practices, departments?
  • What are the qualities of his personality that will move projects along and get the job done?
  • Does she have the thirst for knowledge and inquisitive nature to seamlessly take over an existing position, or create a new one?
  • Can he fit in and manage the attorney personalities within our firm and culture?

Back to the questions at hand: Should you be hiring for fit or function. I’ll go with the Pareto principle on this one. 80% fit and 20% function.

I was out of the office sick on Friday (yes, I was legitimately sick, on a Friday before a 3-day weekend, thank you very much), and am slowly going through my 100+ emails.

The amount of spam is out of control. Usually I just “block” the sender and move on.

But I am noticing a new trend in here.

It’s the personal requests, that are turning into guilt, that turn into anger messages painting me as rude for not responding.

Some of these requests are so bold that they are now attaching meeting requests to drop onto my Outlook calendar.

Look, I didn’t ask you to email me. I didn’t ask for information about your product or service. And, frankly, if I responded to the emails, I think a tribble cascade would begin, so I delete. I mark as spam. I move on.

I just know if I were to reply “no thanks,” they will take that as a permission to start emailing me more. Or, worse yet, calling me and leaving messages.

So here’s my dilemma.

Sometimes I actually know these companies so I can’t block them.

Some of them are well-known service and product vendors in my industry. It might even be a product I am interested in for down the road, but I can’t let on, or the tribble cascade beings and the next thing you know it is out of hand.

I don’t think the onus should be on me to have to return an unsolicited call or email. If I don’t reply, can’t you take that as a “she’s not interested” and move on?

And don’t make me feel bad for not giving you 15 minutes of my time. Because it will never be 15 minutes. You and I both know it.

I’m not looking for an answer here. I’m just venting and justifying my deleting and blocking so many emails today.

 

Just sat in another program where the editor of legal publication said that under absolutely no circumstance will they open up their content. It is all safely tucked behind a firewall. They are in the business of selling newspapers, after all.

I disagree with you, Mr. Editor. You are in the business of distributing content.

Yes. You need to make money. But you want to make money off content that my law firm and my lawyers produce, either by writing articles, being interviewed, submitting our wins and losses, joining your submissions of best whatever.

As far as I am concerned, a publication is only as good as my hyperlinks to it.

If you lock away all of your content, you provide very little value to me and my firm.

I am not asking you to give away your content. But make it searchable. Accessible.

Include the headline, byline and first paragraph. Law360 does that. Gives me something to link to. Sure, it’s a paid service to read the content. I put (subs. req.) after the hyperlinks. But they give me something to hyperlink.

Oh, and I pay Law360 for that service, by the way. And happily so.

So release the Kraken and unlock that content. Or at least give me a little tease.

20130520-215913.jpg I am beside myself tonight. The news is horrible coming out of Moore, Oklahoma. And it keeps getting worse. But that is not what is upsetting me the most. It’s the damn auto tweets and posts that seem so out of place between the devastating news. Here I am. Sitting safe and sound in Los Angeles. Yet I feel like I am there. Social media provided me a first hand account of what was happening to my friends and colleagues in and around Oklahoma City today.

  • Patrick picked up his kids at school while his wife was huddling in the stairwell of her work.
  • Stacy was with the kids in the middle of the house as the storm passed through Tulsa.
  • My friend Tim is a reporter in Norman. I sent him a note via Facebook. I cannot imagine what he has seen today.

When The Voice tweeted out asking who I was going to vote for, I replied:

@heather_morse: .@NBCTheVoice no voting. Too busy praying for the missing children in Moore, OK. #stopautotweets

A few if us are commenting on Twitter how the auto tweets need to stop. It was only a month ago I wrote this piece, When tragedy strikes pull your auto posts immediately. And yet someone on my feed defended them. She’s from OK. She thinks it’s OK to tweet about other things. I disagree. When you have hundreds, if not thousands of followers, you don’t know who is going to be offended. Who is turning to Twitter or Facebook to try and find and connect with family since phone lines are down. How hard is it to just stop for 24 hours? Give everyone a breather from what you are eating, or what seminar you have coming up? We don’t have to always have something witty or pithy to say. What does the disregard for others who are personally impacted by a disaster like this say about your brand? About you? And it’s not just in social media. I had an “owner representative” from my timeshare call me tonight. I told her that I found her call to be highly ill timed due to what was going on in Oklahoma. She didn’t get it and, oops, we were disconnected. Normally I’d call back and complain, but I was too invested in the news to care. All I know is that tonight my heart is breaking for people I do not know. For the children. For their families. For the young man who was crying that all he owned in the world were the clothes he was wearing and his shoes. I don’t want to be sold anything right now. I don’t want a robo-call or auto post to invade my space. I am turning to my social streams for news. Updates. Hope. To quote Woodsy Owl, “Give a hoot. Don’t pollute” my social streams.

I had a busy month. INSANELY busy month preparing for my firm’s inaugural industry-focused conference.

And it came off without a hitch. Seamless. Pretty damn perfect if you ask me, or read the evaluations. A couple typos and one missed nametag. A speaker had to back out at the last minute, but it actually set up a great joke.

Many years ago I got the worst piece of advice, ever: Do a good job and people will notice.

What a crock of shit.

When you do a good job, you need to let people know. When you do a damn good job you need to write a press release or a blog post and let the world know.

Speaking with a partner at the conference, he said the best marketing he does is doing a good job.

I called BS on him, and, after a brief discussion he agreed.

If the guy over there is doing a good job, but is promoting his successes as if they are great, people, and potential clients will take notice.

Everyone reading this knows “that guy” or “that girl.”

You know. Your competitor. Your rival, friendly or not. He isn’t that good at his job. She really isn’t that smart. Has a reputation for not being the best lawyer, marketer, reporter.

But dammit, they have the job, the client, the work. Not you.

They are the one speaking at the podium at that industry conference. Not you.

They are the one quoted in the article. Not you.

They got the job. Not you.

They got the raise and the bonus. Not you.

As I told my boss when the conference was nearing an end: I didn’t do just a good job, I did a great job.

I have a set of skills that is unique in the marketplace. I know enough about enough to throw a seamless event and conference with minimal, and I mean minimal, assistance. And on budget, thank you very much.

I don’t know too many people out there, other than Dee Dee Irwin, who could do the same.

But I had a lot of support. I have a boss who backs me up and allows me to speak freely. I work for a partnership that stood back and let me do what I had to do to get the job done. I am treated with respect as a colleague, not a staffer, or “non-attorney.

I am very lucky to work with the people I work with every Monday through Friday. But, then again, so are they.

Who the hell is Lou Adler and how dare he come up with such a brilliant, simple, and concise description of the workplace? There Are Only Four Jobs in the Whole World – Are You in the Right One?

Everything starts with an idea. This is the first of the four jobs – the Thinkers. Builders convert these ideas into reality. This the second job. Improvers make this reality better. This is the third job. Producers do the work over and over again, delivering quality goods and services to the company’s customers in a repeatable manner. This is the fourth job. And then the process begins again with new ideas and new ways of doing business being developed as the old ones become stale.

In the post, Lou goes into more detail as to the roles the Thinkers, Builders, Improvers and Producers play. So go read it. All of this reminds me of the team assessment I recently did for the LMA board of directors, via The Gabriel Institute. Talk about light bulbs going on in a room. Not only did I understand myself at a whole new level, I started to understand and appreciate the VALUE every person, including myself, on that board brings to the TEAM. I am sooooooo tired of looking inward at me, me, me. I want to know more about how this mish-mosh, mutt of a person/employee/leader interacts and works with YOU. What dynamic do I bring to the team? And is the team the right group of people to get the job done? So, let me introduce myself, I’m an ENTJ who is a Driver (dominance). But more importantly, to the team, I am the Conductor (solving tough problems) and an Improver.  

For anyone following any legal marketing stream on Twitter (#LMA13, for instance), you’ll know that we not only have our scoffers, but we have our haters.

And, honestly, looking at the spam in my filters, who can blame them.

There are a lot of bad promotional people out there targeting lawyers with their wares. But they are not necessarily “legal marketers.”

One thing I have learned from my nearly 15 years as a legal marketer is that not all legal marketers are created equally.

We all don’t do the same thing. We don’t all have the same skill set and experience. And we all don’t work for the same client base.

I work in-house for corporate lawyers. I am diligent that the marketing and business development we do complies with the legal ethics of the states in which we practice.

I know many legal marketing consultants who have worked in-house, and have struck out on their own. Once again, working with corporate lawyers, and well within the boundaries of the legal ethics in which the lawyers operate.

There are other legal marketers who work with consumer lawyers, which is a completely different beast than corporate law. B to C v. B to B.

And, like any industry, there are ne’er–do–wells who are trying to capitalize on an unsophisticated market. They see lawyers as a quick and easy target (Psst. Hey, buddy. Wanna buy a plaque?). Much like there are ne’er-do-well attorneys trying to capitalize on an unsophisticated consumer.

Those fly-by-night marketers do not represent what we do. They are not what I do. Just like ambulance-chasing lawyers are not who we represent.

My job is to help the lawyers in many areas of their business. The 5 Ps of marketing, for short.

LMA Annual Conference

Legal marketers, in general, are about business. The business of law. For some of us, that means businesses of $50 million in revenue and up. For others, at the top of the market, we’re looking at multi-billion dollar a year global operations.

It takes a sophisticated marketer to earn the respect of corporate law. To be given the keys to not only drive the strategic plan, but to create it. A seat at the table. And, better yet, a VOICE at the table.

Heaven knows it takes a thick skin and a strong personality to go toe-to-toe with many of our partners.

And while we have a few haters and scoffers, considering the booming of our profession, we have many more supporters and champions.

So, yeah, I’m Heather Morse. Legal Marketer.

First off, my personal thoughts and prayers to all impacted by today’s terrorist attacks in Boston. It is beyond words.

Unfortunately, while I posted the following message privately in a Facebook legal marketing group, I believe it needs to be posted publicly as well:

For those of you have auto messages set to post via Hootsuite, blogs, etc. you might want to recall them. For instance, I have a dinner invite set to go. I will not be sending it out for a couple days.

Who would guess that the first offender to not pull their auto tweets would be a Boston firm? Oy.

In an increasingly connected world, it is hard to hear of a tragedy and not think immediately to our friends, family and colleagues who might be personally impacted. Yes, the odds are slim, but someone knows these people. Their families.

When your posts are going over a social network, they might not be well received.

In these moments of tragedy, auto posts on Twitter and Facebook come off as crass, out of place, ill-timed, and thoughtless.

So just have a simple policy. Pull them. All of them. Give everyone a minimum of 24-hours to compose themselves. To not be spammed by your firm’s latest blog post, or dinner invitation.

Quickly and personally reach out to those who might be impacted and offer your thoughts and well-wishes.

Take off your lawyer/marketer hat and put on your compassionate, human one. No one will miss your blog post (although I bet it was really special). No one will miss out on our dinner invite if it goes out tomorrow or Wednesday.

Well, I am back in the office and digging through my e-mails, trying to figure out what I missed out on, and, yet, I am still going back and checking the Twitter stream because I am not yet ready to move on from what happened at the LMA Annual Conference. In fact, I get to run upstairs today and see Toby Brown and Aleisha Gravit give a presentation on Pricing, Profitability and the Role of Marketing. I’m making a list of all the blog posts I should write. Hopefully I’ll get to some of them. Already pow-wowing with LMA leaders in LA and San Francisco on what we can bring back from LMA’s annual conference for our local members. I would encourage ALL of us to do the same. Side note: And, if you are not an LMA “leader” yet, watch your in-boxes over the summer for “calls for nominations” to join your local chapter’s board of directors and committees. Already thinking about next year’s conference in Orlando and have blocked my calendar for April 2-4, 2014 (and we are NOT at a Disney property). As I will not be on the conference committee, or the board of directors, I am eligible to submit a program for consideration. Woo hoo!! And I’m loving my new mugs and t-shirts! If you didn’t get a chance to purchase one at LMA, contact Nathalie Daum and she’ll hook you up (no cost to ship!). LMA Mugs

$15 for t-shirts
$6 for mugs
$45 for polo shirts

Prof. David Wilkins, Director, Program on the Legal Profession, Harvard Law School, is on stage right now. He just made a great analogy about the purchasing of legal services that just won’t fit in 140 characters on Twitter.

Folks of a certain age will remember running down to the local record store to buy a new record. It was pre-packaged by the record company. A certain sized and shape. It had a pretty cover. And we were expected to listen to the album in a certain order.

We would drop our money to buy a whole album to get just one song. And if the album wasn’t there, we couldn’t buy it.

(I have several of those albums in my collection, that are now in a box in storage)

And now look how music is purchased.

It’s been completed unbundled. We buy a single song. We download it. We build our own music lists. We share those lists. We are the decider of when and how we will purchase music. The record companies no longer dictate the rules we are living by.

And that is what is happening with legal services. The clients are demanding that the services be unbundled. They want to purchase service as they need them, how they need them.

The analogies are continuing. If you think about legal services being a new suit. Off the rack is just fine for most legal services. You don’t need to purchase a Seville Row suit every time.

Yeah, there will always be the bet the farm cases, the white collar perp walks. But these cases are fewer and farther between every year.