An interesting conversation is taking place in my Legal Marketers Extraordinaire group on Facebook (PM me via the LWC Facebook page for an invite).
An LME asked about a relevant salary survey for in-house marketing professionals. Key word here being relevant.
Honestly, I’ve looked at a lot of the salary surveys out there, and
It’s that time of year.
The invoices and renewals are making their way to my inbox.
I’m going over the 2014 budget and looking to see who’s been naughty or nice.
I have to decide who stays and who goes. Who gets voted off my legal marketing island.
My number one request?
Show me the value!
Why should I renew my subscription, whether for a directory listing, or conference sponsorship? Did I get my $2400, $5000, or $10,000 in value?
Three recent and very real scenarios paint the picture for me.
Scenario 1: Annual association membership, including conference sponsorships at additional financial investment. Annual cost: Big Bucks. ROI: Great potential for new relationship building. Speaking opportunities. This group has the right people, but are we meeting them?? It’s definitely valuable, but expensive. Not too sure, but I need answers.Continue Reading Breaking up is hard to do – Vendor Style
I’ve been working on the business side of law for a long time now. I have attended NUMEROUS general counsel panels. I have read study after study. And I have to ask, “Are any of you listening?”
I was at a presentation yesterday with the good folks at Thomson Reuters. They put up a
Between reading The Lawyer Bubble and this article from The American Lawyer, Calling All Unemployed Law Grads: Greenberg Is Hiring, I have to say, “It’s time, already.”
Well, in truth, I have said it before. Several times, actually. Click here to see >> Law Firm Internship posts on the
I am not a huge promoter of products and services. So when I do, I mean it. I am a big fan of David Allen and his book Getting Things Done. Around 10 years ago, before he hit the stratosphere, I had David lead a program for my then-firm’s attorneys. He was so incredible
I just read the following post SCOTUSblog Won Readers, Not Clients: Popular blog didn’t work as marketing tool for law firm but was a hit with readers, founders tell UGA audience.
I have to disagree.
In general, and in most cases, a corporate legal blogger might not be able to point to a particular piece of business and say, “I brought that in from writing this blog post on that date.”
However, if written correctly, the attorney can most likely point to their practice and see a correlation between their increased business and the launching of their blog.
I just don’t think the folks at SCOTUSblog are correctly measuring its value.
A corporate legal blog is NOT a business development (read SALES) tool in and of itself. It is there to provide what Nancy Myrland calls “digital breadcrumbs“:
Blogging, just as all other content scattered across the Internet, is what I always refer to as “digital breadcrumbs.” The words, thoughts and opinions we share in these spaces serve to help others find a path to us when they happen to need us, or at least when their interest in our areas of expertise is heightened.
A blog, done right, is an educational tool that will position the author and firm. Avvo‘s Josh King agrees:
Too many attorneys and firms treat them like outbound marketing vehicles, doing more overt sales pitches than information and thought leadership.
Blogs are about value, and education. They are about telling the story you want the general counsel to read as they are doing their due diligence on the attorney and the firm. They are about having the right results on page one when your name is Googled.
Getting back to the softer ROI that we’re talking about, Virtual Marketing Officer, Jayne Navarre, points out that the SCOTUSblog article contradicts itself:
Continue Reading How NOT to measure the value of a legal blog
I began my discussion of generational marketing with Talking ’bout My Generation:
In short, generational marketing recognizes that the different generations make purchasing decisions in different ways from one another.
The different life phases we are in presently, coupled with our upbringing and societal norms, provide us with different perspective than those we follow, or those who follow us.
I immediately got an email from my friend and legal marketing peer, David Bruns. He recommended I download and read “I Would Die 4 U: Why Prince Became an Icon,” by Touré.
In short, the book discusses how Prince, a Baby Boomer, became such a huge icon for Generation X.
No icon is so talented that they don’t need the right generation to receive their message. Of course, some icons transcend their time, but that’s nearly impossible without first connecting deeply with the generation that’s consuming culture when you’re at your peak. The difference between being famous and becoming an icon is, in part, having the good fortune to have a generation that’s interested in your message. Pg. 17
It’s the Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers, theory of 10,000 hours of experience to achieve mastery, plus the luck of timing when that knowledge/skill is needed, the audience is ready, as in the case of Prince.
The author goes on to discuss Prince’s less than welcoming response when he opened for the Rolling Stones on October 9 & 11, 1981, here in Los Angeles. He was pelted with garbage and drinks, and literally booed off the stage. Twice. (FYI. The Sports Dude and I were at that concert. He even saved the ticket stubs).
Controversy was just too controversial for the crowd of hippies and boomers. We up and coming Gen Xers got it, though … we were waiting and ready for the Purple Revolution that was about to come out with “1999.” And we were really confused why the adults in the crowd didn’t get it.
So what does Prince have to do with legal marketing and generational marketing? It’s all in how we interpret his experience to our industry.
Continue Reading Prince, A Revolution, and Legal Marketing
On August 29, 2013, the webinar “Overview of the New Florida Bar Rules with Florida Bar Ethics Counsel Elizabeth Clark Tarbert” was presented to the Legal Marketing Association Southeast Chapter members.
A fellow Coolerite wrote the following recap of one very important point of the presentation, asking that his/her name not be used:
A fellow legal marketer recently brought up Avvo in my Legal Marketers Extraordinaire Group on Facebook (message me on the Legal Watercooler’s Facebook page if you would like to join).
She was wondering about the value.
Avvo has always had its distractors, but I’ve always taken a “meh” position. Why? Because I’m in corporate law.
Seriously. Can the one person who likes the billable hour please raise your hand?? I’d like to know what about it you like? Is it the math? Junior partner Susan is standing in line to purchase a frappuccino and decides to check her e-mail. If it takes Susan 3 minutes to read and respond to